Cyber-Physical Crisis Management in Smart Ports: IoT Resilience, Big Data Emergency Analytics, and Digital Business Continuity for Maritime Operations

Authors

  • Siska Tampubolon Vocatinoal High School Of 1 Banjarbaru

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55123/ijisit.v2i1.121

Keywords:

Smart Ports, Cyber-PhysicalSystems, Sustainability Governance, Maritime Resilience, Crisis Management

Abstract

This study examines the effectiveness of cyber-physical crisis management in strengthening sustainability and operational resilience within smart port ecosystems. As maritime hubs become increasingly digitized, they face complex risks from cyberattacks, climate change, and global supply chain disruptions. This research applies a qualitative methodology using thematic analysis, cross-group comparison, and narrative synthesis to analyze perspectives from maritime experts, lecturers, and graduates. The results indicate very high effectiveness of IoT-based infrastructure monitoring, AI-driven predictive analytics, integrated cybersecurity governance, and digitally aligned enterprise architecture in enhancing crisis response and operational continuity. Findings show strong consensus regarding the need for interdisciplinary competency development and digital governance harmonization, while highlighting varying perceptions of implementation readiness. The study addresses gaps in prior port management research by integrating sustainability governance with cyber resilience frameworks. Practically, it offers a strategic reference for policymakers, port authorities, and maritime education institutions to strengthen digital preparedness and sustainable crisis response systems. The research concludes that resilient smart ports require technological innovation, institutional coordination, and human capital development to maintain long-term stability and environmental responsibility.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] V. Caldeirinha, J. A. Felício, T. Pinho, and R. Rodrigues, “Fuzzy-Set QCA on Performance and Sustainability Determinants of Ports Supporting Floating Offshore Wind Farms,” Sustainability, vol. 16, no. 7, p. 2947, 2024, doi: 10.3390/su16072947.

[2] H. Paridaens and T. Notteboom, “National Integrated Maritime Policies (IMP): Vision Formulation, Regional Embeddedness, and Institutional Attributes for Effective Policy Integration,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 17, p. 9557, 2021, doi: 10.3390/su13179557.

[3] W. Zhang, Y. Zhang, and W. Qiao, “Risk Scenario Evaluation for Intelligent Ships by Mapping Hierarchical Holographic Modeling Into Risk Filtering, Ranking and Management,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 4, p. 2103, 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14042103.

[4] P. Caldas, M. I. Pedro, and R. C. Marques, “An Assessment of Container Seaport Efficiency Determinants,” Sustainability, vol. 16, no. 11, p. 4427, 2024, doi: 10.3390/su16114427.

[5] K. Zhou, X. Yuan, Z. Guo, J. Wu, and R. Li, “Research on Sustainable Port: Evaluation of Green Port Policies on China’s Coasts,” Sustainability, vol. 16, no. 10, p. 4017, 2024, doi: 10.3390/su16104017.

[6] Y.-H. Liao and H.-S. Lee, “Using a Directional Distance Function to Measure the Environmental Efficiency of International Liner Shipping Companies and Assess Regulatory Impact,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 4, p. 3821, 2023, doi: 10.3390/su15043821.

[7] S.-K. Kim, S. Choi, and C. Kim, “The Framework for Measuring Port Resilience in Korean Port Case,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 21, p. 11883, 2021, doi: 10.3390/su132111883.

[8] G.-Y. Chae, S.-H. An, and C.-Y. Lee, “Demand Forecasting for Liquified Natural Gas Bunkering by Country and Region Using Meta-Analysis and Artificial Intelligence,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 16, p. 9058, 2021, doi: 10.3390/su13169058.

[9] B. Kim, G. Kim, and M.-H. Kang, “Study on Comparing the Performance of Fully Automated Container Terminals During the COVID-19 Pandemic,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 15, p. 9415, 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14159415.

[10] A. Bilal, L. Xiao-ping, Z. Nanli, R. Sharma, and A. Jahanger, “Green Technology Innovation, Globalization, and CO2 Emissions: Recent Insights From the OBOR Economies,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 236, 2021, doi: 10.3390/su14010236.

[11] P. Ciancarini, R. Giancarlo, and G. Grimaudo, “Digital Transformation in the Public Administrations: A Guided Tour for Computer Scientists,” IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 20890–20915, 2024, doi: 10.1109/access.2024.3363075.

[12] A. D. Elbouzidi, A. Artiba, R. Pellerin, S. Lamouri, E. T. Valencia, and M.-J. Bélanger, “The Role of AI in Warehouse Digital Twins: Literature Review,” Applied Sciences, vol. 13, no. 11, p. 6746, 2023, doi: 10.3390/app13116746.

[13] B. Zyoud and S. L. Lutfi, “The Role of Information Security Culture in Zero Trust Adoption: Insights From UAE Organizations,” IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 68775–68790, 2024, doi: 10.1109/access.2024.3402341.

[14] N. A. Ahmad, S. M. Drus, and H. Kasim, “Factors That Influence the Adoption of Enterprise Architecture by Public Sector Organizations: An Empirical Study,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 113162–113181, 2020, doi: 10.1109/access.2020.2996584.

[15] A. A. Al-Kadhimi, M. M. Singh, and M. N. A. Khalid, “A Systematic Literature Review and a Conceptual Framework Proposition for Advanced Persistent Threats (APT) Detection for Mobile Devices Using Artificial Intelligence Techniques,” Applied Sciences, vol. 13, no. 14, p. 8056, 2023, doi: 10.3390/app13148056.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-30

How to Cite

Siska Tampubolon. (2025). Cyber-Physical Crisis Management in Smart Ports: IoT Resilience, Big Data Emergency Analytics, and Digital Business Continuity for Maritime Operations. IJISIT: International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology, 2(1), 47–52. https://doi.org/10.55123/ijisit.v2i1.121

Issue

Section

Articles