Virtual Reality-Based Safety Training for Future Seafarers: Immersive Technology Adoption Barriers in Indonesian MET Institutions

Authors

  • Rosna Yuherlina Siahaan Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Pelayaran Jakarta
  • Derma Watty Sihombing Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Pelayaran Jakarta
  • Harita Julie Zefanya Matondang Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Pelayaran Jakarta
  • Harika Lucia Agnes Matondang Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Pelayaran Jakarta
  • Didik Sulistyo Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Pelayaran Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55123/ijisit.v2i2.57

Keywords:

Virtual Reality, Safety Training, Emergency Procedures, Immersive Learning, Maritime Education

Abstract

Virtual Reality (VR) technology offers transformative potential for maritime safety training by creating fully immersive simulations of emergency scenarios—fires, flooding, abandon ship procedures, enclosed space entry—enabling repeated practice in psychologically realistic conditions without the costs, risks, and logistical constraints of physical drills. Yet VR adoption in Indonesian maritime education remains limited despite compelling pedagogical benefits. This study investigates VR safety training implementation effectiveness and adoption barriers through mixed-methods research combining quasi-experimental competency assessment with qualitative stakeholder consultation. VR-trained cadets (n=78) were compared against traditional training controls (n=81) on emergency procedure competency and stress management performance, supplemented by Focus Group Discussions with students, instructors, and administrators exploring implementation challenges. Findings demonstrate that VR-based safety training improves overall emergency response competency by 34.2 percent and stress management performance by 34.5 percent with large effect sizes (Cohen's d = 1.15 and 0.91 respectively), yet adoption is constrained by high initial costs ($168,600 for minimal 3-station facility), limited maritime-specific content availability, instructor training requirements, and cost-benefit conviction gaps where discretionary effectiveness improvements compete against mandatory compliance investments. The study proposes a VR Safety Training Adoption Roadmap incorporating phased implementation, cooperative content development, creative financing strategies, and regulatory integration to navigate tensions between proven effectiveness benefits and practical implementation barriers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] International Maritime Organization, STCW Including 2010 Manila Amendments. London, UK: IMO Publishing, 2017.

[2] S. C. Mallam, S. Nazir, and S. K. Renganayagalu, "Rethinking maritime education, training, and operations in the digital era: Applications for emerging immersive technologies," Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, vol. 7, no. 12, p. 428, 2019.

[3] K. E. Stanney, R. R. Mourant, and R. S. Kennedy, "Human factors issues in virtual environments: A review of the literature," Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 327–351, 1998.

[4] M. Mujeeb-Ahmed, M. Iqbal, and M. Soomro, "Maritime education and training: A systematic review of literature," Australian Journal of Maritime & Ocean Affairs, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 156–174, 2019.

[5] D. Z. Deniz, "Safety culture in STCW maritime education and training," in Proceedings of International Symposium on Engineering and Technology, 2019, pp. 158–164.

[6] F. Buttussi and L. Chittaro, "Effects of different types of virtual reality display on presence and learning in a safety training scenario," IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 1063–1076, 2018.

[7] L. Jensen and F. Konradsen, "A review of the use of virtual reality head-mounted displays in education and training," Education and Information Technologies, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 1515–1529, 2018.

[8] K. M. Stanney and P. Hash, "Locus of user-initiated control in virtual environments: Influences on cybersickness," Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 447–459, 1998.

[9] D. A. Kolb, Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1984.

[10] J. Sweller, "Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design," Learning and Instruction, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 295–312, 1994.

[11] D. Meichenbaum, Stress Inoculation Training. New York, NY: Pergamon Press, 1985.

[12] J. S. Brown, A. Collins, and P. Duguid, "Situated cognition and the culture of learning," Educational Researcher, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 32–42, 1989.

[13] J. Radianti, T. A. Majchrzak, J. Fromm, and I. Wohlgenannt, "A systematic review of immersive virtual reality applications for higher education: Design elements, lessons learned, and research agenda," Computers & Education, vol. 147, p. 103778, 2020.

[14] Indonesian Directorate General of Sea Transportation, Maritime Education Infrastructure Assessment Report 2023. Jakarta, Indonesia: Ministry of Transportation, 2023.

[15] G. Makransky, T. S. Terkildsen, and R. E. Mayer, "Adding immersive virtual reality to a science lab simulation causes more presence but less learning," Learning and Instruction, vol. 60, pp. 225–236, 2019.

[16] T. A. Mikropoulos and A. Natsis, "Educational virtual environments: A ten-year review of empirical research (1999–2009)," Computers & Education, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 769–780, 2011.

[17] D. A. Bowman and R. P. McMahan, "Virtual reality: How much immersion is enough?" Computer, vol. 40, no. 7, pp. 36–43, 2007.

[18] J. J. LaViola Jr., "A discussion of cybersickness in virtual environments," ACM SIGCHI Bulletin, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 47–56, 2000.

[19] V. Braun and V. Clarke, "Using thematic analysis in psychology," Qualitative Research in Psychology, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 77–101, 2006.

[20] J. W. Creswell and V. L. Plano Clark, Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 2018.

[21] M. Hetherington, R. Flin, and K. Mearns, "Safety in shipping: The human element," Journal of Safety Research, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 401–411, 2006.

[22] M. Q. Patton, Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods, 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 2015.

[23] J. Cohen, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1988.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-30

How to Cite

Rosna Yuherlina Siahaan, Derma Watty Sihombing, Harita Julie Zefanya Matondang, Harika Lucia Agnes Matondang, & Didik Sulistyo. (2025). Virtual Reality-Based Safety Training for Future Seafarers: Immersive Technology Adoption Barriers in Indonesian MET Institutions. IJISIT: International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology, 2(2), 184–193. https://doi.org/10.55123/ijisit.v2i2.57