Green Digital Port Transformation for Sustainable Maritime Competitiveness

Authors

  • Febryan Dwi Cahyo Vocational High School Taruna Bangsa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55123/ijisit.v2i1.90

Keywords:

Green Port, Digital Transformation, Port Sustainability, Artificial Intelligence, Maritime Policy

Abstract

Global maritime trade growth demands ports to enhance sustainability, resilience, and digital capability simultaneously. This study investigates the integration of green port policies and digital transformation strategies to improve port performance and environmental responsibility. Using a comprehensive literature-based analysis, the research synthesizes findings on port efficiency determinants, emission reduction mechanisms, shore power deployment, automation systems, artificial intelligence applications, digital twins, and resilience measurement frameworks. The results indicate that environmental regulations combined with technological innovation significantly enhance operational efficiency, reduce carbon emissions, and strengthen risk management capacity. Automated container terminals and AI-based forecasting systems improve productivity and adaptability, particularly during disruptions such as global crises. Furthermore, integrated maritime policies and sustainability governance frameworks play a critical role in aligning economic objectives with environmental targets. The study proposes a conceptual Green Digital Port framework that links policy integration, technological adoption, and sustainability performance. This research contributes to maritime studies by providing a structured analytical foundation to guide port authorities, policymakers, and maritime stakeholders in implementing effective green and digital transformation strategies for long-term competitiveness.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] V. Caldeirinha, J. A. Felício, T. Pinho, and R. Rodrigues, “Fuzzy-Set QCA on Performance and Sustainability Determinants of Ports Supporting Floating Offshore Wind Farms,” Sustainability, vol. 16, no. 7, p. 2947, 2024, doi: 10.3390/su16072947.

[2] H. Paridaens and T. Notteboom, “National Integrated Maritime Policies (IMP): Vision Formulation, Regional Embeddedness, and Institutional Attributes for Effective Policy Integration,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 17, p. 9557, 2021, doi: 10.3390/su13179557.

[3] W. Zhang, Y. Zhang, and W. Qiao, “Risk Scenario Evaluation for Intelligent Ships by Mapping Hierarchical Holographic Modeling Into Risk Filtering, Ranking and Management,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 4, p. 2103, 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14042103.

[4] J. Qi, S. Wang, and J. Zheng, “Shore Power Deployment Problem—A Case Study of a Chinese Container Shipping Network,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 11, p. 6928, 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14116928.

[5] P. Caldas, M. I. Pedro, and R. C. Marques, “An Assessment of Container Seaport Efficiency Determinants,” Sustainability, vol. 16, no. 11, p. 4427, 2024, doi: 10.3390/su16114427.

[6] K. Zhou, X. Yuan, Z. Guo, J. Wu, and R. Li, “Research on Sustainable Port: Evaluation of Green Port Policies on China’s Coasts,” Sustainability, vol. 16, no. 10, p. 4017, 2024, doi: 10.3390/su16104017.

[7] Y.-H. Liao and H.-S. Lee, “Using a Directional Distance Function to Measure the Environmental Efficiency of International Liner Shipping Companies and Assess Regulatory Impact,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 4, p. 3821, 2023, doi: 10.3390/su15043821.

[8] S.-K. Kim, S. Choi, and C. Kim, “The Framework for Measuring Port Resilience in Korean Port Case,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 21, p. 11883, 2021, doi: 10.3390/su132111883.

[9] G.-Y. Chae, S.-H. An, and C.-Y. Lee, “Demand Forecasting for Liquified Natural Gas Bunkering by Country and Region Using Meta-Analysis and Artificial Intelligence,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 16, p. 9058, 2021, doi: 10.3390/su13169058.

[10] F. Pian, L. Xu, Y. Chen, and S.-H. Lee, “Global Emission Taxes and Port Privatization Policies Under International Competition,” Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 16, p. 6595, 2020, doi: 10.3390/su12166595.

[11] B. Kim, G. Kim, and M.-H. Kang, “Study on Comparing the Performance of Fully Automated Container Terminals During the COVID-19 Pandemic,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 15, p. 9415, 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14159415.

[12] A. Bilal, L. Xiao-ping, Z. Nanli, R. Sharma, and A. Jahanger, “Green Technology Innovation, Globalization, and CO2 Emissions: Recent Insights From the OBOR Economies,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 236, 2021, doi: 10.3390/su14010236.

[13] P. Ciancarini, R. Giancarlo, and G. Grimaudo, “Digital Transformation in the Public Administrations: A Guided Tour for Computer Scientists,” IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 20890–20915, 2024, doi: 10.1109/access.2024.3363075.

[14] A. D. Elbouzidi, A. Artiba, R. Pellerin, S. Lamouri, E. T. Valencia, and M.-J. Bélanger, “The Role of AI in Warehouse Digital Twins: Literature Review,” Applied Sciences, vol. 13, no. 11, p. 6746, 2023, doi: 10.3390/app13116746.

[15] Y. Shi, T. Ramayah, L. Hongmei, Y. Zhang, and W. Wang, “Analysing the Current Status, Hotspots, and Future Trends of Technology Management: Using the WoS and Scopus Database,” Heliyon, vol. 9, no. 9, p. e19922, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19922.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-30

How to Cite

Febryan Dwi Cahyo. (2025). Green Digital Port Transformation for Sustainable Maritime Competitiveness. IJISIT: International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology, 2(1), 40–46. https://doi.org/10.55123/ijisit.v2i1.90

Issue

Section

Articles